Opening LOG-01…
Mission log 01 · Origins

The genesis of
our satellite project

Published 20 May 2025 Dec 2024 — Apr 2025 6 min read Phase 1
The workbench during initial component testing

It all started in December 2024, when the team came together brimming with ideas for a satellite monitoring system. That first phase was about solidifying the vision, defining what the project was actually for, and laying groundwork solid enough to build on.

The question we kept returning to was deceptively simple: how cheaply can a student team put a genuinely useful atmospheric instrument above the weather — and get the data back? Everything downstream, every component choice and every argument about tolerances, traces back to that.

Building the bill of materials

By January 2025 we had shifted into the nitty-gritty of component selection and the Phase 1 bill of materials. This was the critical step: every part, from microcontroller to sensor, had to integrate cleanly and perform under conditions we couldn't fully rehearse on the ground. We researched methodically and chose for reliability and efficiency rather than spec-sheet glamour.

Choosing parts is not shopping. Every line on the BOM is a commitment you have to defend at three in the morning when a bench test fails.
SubsystemPhase 1 selection
Flight computerMicrocontroller, low-power
Pressure / altitudeBarometric sensor
Temperature & humidityDual-channel
Attitude6-axis IMU
Air qualityGas sensor
DownlinkLoRa + GSM

The components arrive

The excitement genuinely ramped up when the Phase 1 components arrived in March 2025. Unboxing them felt like opening a treasure chest — each part brought us measurably closer to turning a set of ideas into a tangible system.

Workbench with components under test
The workbench buzzing with activity — initial tests of the core components.

Validating every part on the bench

Through March and April 2025 the lab was a hub of activity as we tested each component and sensor in isolation. This wasn't a formality. Validating functionality before integration is what stops a single bad part from turning into a week of chasing ghosts in a fully assembled system.

  • Each sensor characterised against a known reference before it was trusted.
  • Power draw measured per subsystem, so the flight budget was real rather than estimated.
  • Failure modes documented — what a part does when it is almost working.

With every part individually proven, the next problem was the one that would define the rest of the programme: getting the data down.

← Index All mission logs